On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:01:56AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 10:47 +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:55 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > > > > Le mercredi 15 mars 2017 à 11:50 +0100, Philippe De Muyter a écrit : > > > > > > I would say: camorama, xawtv3, zbar, google talk, skype. If it runs > > > > > > with those, it will likely run with any other application. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to add the 'v4l2src' plugin of gstreamer, and on the > > > > > imx6 its > > > > > > > > While it would be nice if somehow you would get v4l2src to work (in > > > > some legacy/emulation mode through libv4l2), > > > > > > v4l2src works just fine, provided the pipeline is configured manually in > > > advance via media-ctl. > > > > Including choosing the framerate ? Sorry, I have no time these days > > to test it myself. > > No, the framerate is set with media-ctl on the CSI output pad. To really > choose the framerate, the element would indeed need a deeper > understanding of the pipeline, as the resulting framerate depends on at > least the source v4l2_subdevice (sensor) framerate and the CSI frame > skipping.
Count me in than as a supporter of Steve's "v4l2-mc: add a function to inherit controls from a pipeline" patch > > of the image buffers for further processing by other (not necessarily next > > in gstreamer pipeline, or for all frames) hardware-accelerated plugins likes > > the h.264 video encoder. As I am stuck with fsl/nxp kernel and driver on > > that > > matter, I don't know how the interfaces have evolved in current linux > > kernels. > > The physical address of the image buffers is hidden from userspace by > dma-buf objects, but those can be passed around to the next driver > without copying the image data. OK thanks Philippe
