On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:41:35PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Currently, iTCO watchdog driver uses memory map to access
> PMC_CFG GCR register. But the entire GCR address space is
> already mapped in intel_scu_ipc driver. So remapping the
intel_pmc_ipc driver.
> GCR register in this driver causes the mem request failure in
> iTCO_wdt probe function. This patch fixes this issue by
> using PMC GCR read/write API's to access PMC_CFG register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
> <sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c
> index 3d0abc0..31abfc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@
> #include <linux/io.h> /* For inb/outb/... */
> #include <linux/platform_data/itco_wdt.h>
>
> +#include <asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h>
> +
> #include "iTCO_vendor.h"
>
> /* Address definitions for the TCO */
> @@ -94,12 +96,6 @@ struct iTCO_wdt_private {
> unsigned int iTCO_version;
> struct resource *tco_res;
> struct resource *smi_res;
> - /*
> - * NO_REBOOT flag is Memory-Mapped GCS register bit 5 (TCO version 2),
> - * or memory-mapped PMC register bit 4 (TCO version 3).
> - */
Better to retain this comment elsewhere.
> - struct resource *gcs_pmc_res;
> - unsigned long __iomem *gcs_pmc;
> /* the lock for io operations */
> spinlock_t io_lock;
> /* the PCI-device */
> @@ -176,9 +172,9 @@ static void iTCO_wdt_set_NO_REBOOT_bit(struct
> iTCO_wdt_private *p)
>
> /* Set the NO_REBOOT bit: this disables reboots */
> if (p->iTCO_version >= 2) {
> - val32 = readl(p->gcs_pmc);
> + val32 = intel_pmc_gcr_read(PMC_GCR_PMC_CFG_REG);
better to have protection and error handling, discussed in v2, 2/4.
compiled and tested this on APL and i see iTCO_WDT driver loads fine. Since
it impacts core WDT functionality, need to be thoroughly tested on various
platforms.
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Best Regards,
Rajneesh
