Hi Will, Michal, 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <[email protected]>: > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a): >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools. >>> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++--- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it, > > Great, please merge it. > > >> but I don't see >> the rest of the series queued anywhere. > > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree. > > Thanks, > Michal > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec. So, how shall we handle this series? I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree, but 6/6 will be postponed in the case. If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series to linux-kbuild. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
