On 2017年03月21日 18:25, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello!
On 3/21/2017 7:04 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 65
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 6c70444..4771ded 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -247,6 +247,22 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct
ptr_ring *r)
return ptr;
}
+static inline int __ptr_ring_consume_batched(struct ptr_ring *r,
+ void **array, int n)
+{
+ void *ptr;
+ int i = 0;
+
+ while (i < n) {
Hm, why not *for*?
Yes, it maybe better, if there's other comment on the series, will
change it in next version.
Thanks
