On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:50:34PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > The mv88e6xxx_info structure for the 88E6191 chip was pointing the > mv88e6391_ops definition instead of mv88e6191_ops. Fix this.
mv88e6391_ops and mv88e6191_ops appear to be identical, so effectively
there is no bug here. So no need to have this in -stable.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
Andrew
