On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:59:17 +0300 Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > wrote: > > It is perfectly fine to link a tmpfile back using linkat(). > > Since tmpfiles are created with a link count of 0 they appear > > on the orphan list, upon re-linking the inode has to be removed > > from the orphan list again. > > > > Looks good. Nothing to add. Thanks to both of you. Ralph > > > Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> > > Cc: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com > > typo: missing closing > > > > Reported-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com> > > Tested-by: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhau...@gmail.com> > > Reported-by: Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com > > and here too > > > Fixes: 474b93704f321 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE") > > Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <rich...@nod.at> > > --- > > fs/ubifs/dir.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > > index 0858213a4e63..0139155045fe 100644 > > --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c > > +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > > @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int ubifs_link(struct dentry > > *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, goto out_fname; > > > > lock_2_inodes(dir, inode); > > + > > + /* Handle O_TMPFILE corner case, it is allowed to link a > > O_TMPFILE. */ > > + if (inode->i_nlink == 0) > > + ubifs_delete_orphan(c, inode->i_ino); > > + > > inc_nlink(inode); > > ihold(inode); > > inode->i_ctime = ubifs_current_time(inode); > > -- > > 2.7.3 > >