Am 30.03.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Adrian Hunter: >> Reading deeper into the proved that I was wrong. >> AFAIKT UBIFS' journal has currently no way to revive a deleted inode. >> So, we have to think about a new solution. > > Deleting the orphan looks right. Just need to understand whether the > recovery would do the right thing - actually it looks like O_TMPFILE might > be OK and in other case we might be failing to remove nodes with sequence > numbers greater than the deletion inode.
Sadly it does not the right thing. I'm currently investigating why and how to deal with it. I also managed to trigger that case. :( Thanks, //richard
