On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
> Andrew Lunn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > - sata@a8000 {
> > > + satac0: sata@a8000 {
> >
> > Hi Ralph
> >
> > Why the c in satac0?
>
> For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a port,
> similarly to pciec and pcie1. See armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.
:~/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts$ ls *ds116*
ls: cannot access '*ds116*': No such file or directory
But anyway, a few boards seem to solve this by calling the controller
node ahci0: and the port sata0:
> > > - usb3@f0000 {
> > > + usb3_0: usb3@f0000 {
> > > compatible =
> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > - usb3@f8000 {
> > > + usb3_1: usb3@f8000 {
> > > compatible =
> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >
> > I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
> > there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?
>
> It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
> case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
> armada-388-gp.dts.
Humm...
/* CON4 */
usb@58000 {
vcc-supply = <®_usb2_0_vbus>;
status = "okay";
};
/* CON5 */
usb3@f0000 {
usb-phy = <&usb2_1_phy>;
status = "okay";
};
/* CON7 */
usb3@f8000 {
usb-phy = <&usb3_phy>;
status = "okay";
};
Is this clear? Is CON5 a USB 3 host, but has a USB 2 PHY connected to
it? CON7 is the only true USB 3 port? I think some comments written in
schwiizerdütsch would be clearre.:-)
Andrew
