On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 18:59 -0700, Chewie Lin wrote: > Replace string with formatted arguments in the dev_warn() call. It removes > the checkpatch warning: > > WARNING: Prefer using "%s", __func__ to embedded function names > #417: FILE: main_usb.c:417: > + "usb_device_reset fail status=%d\n", status); > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 1058 lines checked > > And after fix: > > main_usb.c has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > Signed-off-by: Chewie Lin <li...@oregonstate.edu> > --- > drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c > b/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c > index 9e074e9..2d9e7af 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static void usb_device_reset(struct vnt_private *priv) > status = usb_reset_device(priv->usb); > if (status) > dev_warn(&priv->usb->dev, > - "usb_device_reset fail status=%d\n", status); > + "%s=%d\n", "usb_device_reset fail status", status);
So, what is failing? usb_reset_device or usb_device_reset? And this function is used exactly once, is trivial, and would likely be better as direct code in the one place it's used.
