On 04/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes: > > I agree that changing userspace semantics is something to be very > careful with. But at least for purposes of discussion I think this is a > good patch.
I agree that we need it with your approach, but imo it would be much better to not depend on the subtle changes like this. My 2/2 or your 1/5 are already bad enough. > I can avoid this change but it requires moving sighand->siglock > into signal_struct and introducing a new spinlock into sighand_struct > to just guard the signal handlers. Oh, this looks much, much worse to me. Oleg.
