On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> From: Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net>
>
> Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery provides
> power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS.
>
> Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net>
> Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> no changes in v3
>
> changes in v2:
> * fixed typo in commit message
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device
> *hidpp,
> static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = {
> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE,
This certainly assumes some other patchset to be already applied, right?
Which tree is this patchset based on, please?
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
