On Apr 06 2017 or thereabouts, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>
> > From: Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net>
> >
> > Without a scope defined, UPower assumes that the battery provides
> > power to the computer it's connected to, like a laptop battery or a UPS.
> >
> > Tested-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > no changes in v3
> >
> > changes in v2:
> > * fixed typo in commit message
> > ---
> > drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > index 4eeb550..4aaf237 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static int hidpp20_battery_event(struct hidpp_device
> > *hidpp,
> > static enum power_supply_property hidpp_battery_props[] = {
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_STATUS,
> > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY,
> > + POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SCOPE,
>
> This certainly assumes some other patchset to be already applied, right?
Hehe, once again you forgot about it, and me to make a note about it
too ;-)
>
> Which tree is this patchset based on, please?
Your for-4.8/logitech-hidpp-battery branch :)
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
>
