Hi Marek,

Le 07/04/2017 à 01:37, Marek Vasut a écrit :
> On 03/23/2017 12:33 AM, Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> Before this patch, m25p80_read() supported few SPI protocols:
>> - regular SPI 1-1-1
>> - SPI Dual Output 1-1-2
>> - SPI Quad Output 1-1-4
>> On the other hand, m25p80_write() only supported SPI 1-1-1.
>>
>> This patch updates both m25p80_read() and m25p80_write() functions to let
>> them support SPI 1-2-2 and SPI 1-4-4 protocols for Fast Read and Page
>> Program SPI commands.
>>
>> It adopts a conservative approach to avoid regressions. Hence the new
>                                              ^ FYI, regression != bug
> 
>> implementations try to be as close as possible to the old implementations,
>> so the main differences are:
>> - the tx_nbits values now being set properly for the spi_transfer
>>   structures carrying the (op code + address/dummy) bytes
>> - and the spi_transfer structure being split into 2 spi_transfer
>>   structures when the numbers of I/O lines are different for op code and
>>   for address/dummy byte transfers on the SPI bus.
>>
>> Besides, the current spi-nor framework supports neither the SPI 2-2-2 nor
>> the SPI 4-4-4 protocols. So, for now, we don't need to update the
>> m25p80_{read|write}_reg() functions as SPI 1-1-1 is the only one possible
>> protocol.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitc...@atmel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c | 120 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> index 68986a26c8fe..64d562efc25d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,19 @@ struct m25p {
>>      u8                      command[MAX_CMD_SIZE];
>>  };
>>  
>> +static inline void m25p80_proto2nbits(enum spi_nor_protocol proto,
>> +                                  unsigned int *inst_nbits,
>> +                                  unsigned int *addr_nbits,
>> +                                  unsigned int *data_nbits)
>> +{
> 
> Why don't we just have some generic macros to extract the number of bits
> from $proto ?
>

from Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:
"Generally, inline functions are preferable to macros resembling functions."

inline functions provide better type checking of their arguments and/or
returned value than macros.

Type checking is also the reason I have chosen to create the 'enum
spi_nor_protocol' rather than using constant macros.

>> +    if (inst_nbits)
>> +            *inst_nbits = spi_nor_get_protocol_inst_width(proto);
>> +    if (addr_nbits)
>> +            *addr_nbits = spi_nor_get_protocol_addr_width(proto);
>> +    if (data_nbits)
>> +            *data_nbits = spi_nor_get_protocol_data_width(proto);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int m25p80_read_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 code, u8 *val, int len)
>>  {
>>      struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>> @@ -78,11 +91,16 @@ static ssize_t m25p80_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t 
>> to, size_t len,
>>  {
>>      struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>>      struct spi_device *spi = flash->spi;
>> -    struct spi_transfer t[2] = {};
>> +    unsigned int inst_nbits, addr_nbits, data_nbits, data_idx;
>> +    struct spi_transfer t[3] = {};
>>      struct spi_message m;
>>      int cmd_sz = m25p_cmdsz(nor);
>>      ssize_t ret;
>>  
>> +    /* get transfer protocols. */
>> +    m25p80_proto2nbits(nor->write_proto, &inst_nbits,
>> +                       &addr_nbits, &data_nbits);
>> +
>>      spi_message_init(&m);
>>  
>>      if (nor->program_opcode == SPINOR_OP_AAI_WP && nor->sst_write_second)
>> @@ -92,12 +110,27 @@ static ssize_t m25p80_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t 
>> to, size_t len,
>>      m25p_addr2cmd(nor, to, flash->command);
>>  
>>      t[0].tx_buf = flash->command;
>> +    t[0].tx_nbits = inst_nbits;
>>      t[0].len = cmd_sz;
>>      spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
>>  
>> -    t[1].tx_buf = buf;
>> -    t[1].len = len;
>> -    spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
>> +    /* split the op code and address bytes into two transfers if needed. */
>> +    data_idx = 1;
>> +    if (addr_nbits != inst_nbits) {
>> +            t[0].len = 1;
>> +
>> +            t[1].tx_buf = &flash->command[1];
>> +            t[1].tx_nbits = addr_nbits;
>> +            t[1].len = cmd_sz - 1;
>> +            spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
>> +
>> +            data_idx = 2;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    t[data_idx].tx_buf = buf;
>> +    t[data_idx].tx_nbits = data_nbits;
>> +    t[data_idx].len = len;
>> +    spi_message_add_tail(&t[data_idx], &m);
>>  
>>      ret = spi_sync(spi, &m);
>>      if (ret)
>> @@ -109,18 +142,6 @@ static ssize_t m25p80_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t 
>> to, size_t len,
>>      return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static inline unsigned int m25p80_rx_nbits(struct spi_nor *nor)
>> -{
>> -    switch (nor->read_proto) {
>> -    case SNOR_PROTO_1_1_2:
>> -            return 2;
>> -    case SNOR_PROTO_1_1_4:
>> -            return 4;
>> -    default:
>> -            return 0;
>> -    }
>> -}
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Read an address range from the nor chip.  The address range
>>   * may be any size provided it is within the physical boundaries.
>> @@ -130,13 +151,19 @@ static ssize_t m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t 
>> from, size_t len,
>>  {
>>      struct m25p *flash = nor->priv;
>>      struct spi_device *spi = flash->spi;
>> -    struct spi_transfer t[2];
>> +    unsigned int inst_nbits, addr_nbits, data_nbits, data_idx;
>> +    struct spi_transfer t[3];
>>      struct spi_message m;
>>      unsigned int dummy = nor->read_dummy;
>>      ssize_t ret;
>> +    int cmd_sz;
>> +
>> +    /* get transfer protocols. */
>> +    m25p80_proto2nbits(nor->read_proto, &inst_nbits,
>> +                       &addr_nbits, &data_nbits);
>>  
>>      /* convert the dummy cycles to the number of bytes */
>> -    dummy /= 8;
>> +    dummy = (dummy * addr_nbits) / 8;
>>  
>>      if (spi_flash_read_supported(spi)) {
>>              struct spi_flash_read_message msg;
>> @@ -149,10 +176,9 @@ static ssize_t m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t 
>> from, size_t len,
>>              msg.read_opcode = nor->read_opcode;
>>              msg.addr_width = nor->addr_width;
>>              msg.dummy_bytes = dummy;
>> -            /* TODO: Support other combinations */
>> -            msg.opcode_nbits = SPI_NBITS_SINGLE;
>> -            msg.addr_nbits = SPI_NBITS_SINGLE;
>> -            msg.data_nbits = m25p80_rx_nbits(nor);
>> +            msg.opcode_nbits = inst_nbits;
>> +            msg.addr_nbits = addr_nbits;
>> +            msg.data_nbits = data_nbits;
>>  
>>              ret = spi_flash_read(spi, &msg);
>>              if (ret < 0)
>> @@ -167,20 +193,45 @@ static ssize_t m25p80_read(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t 
>> from, size_t len,
>>      m25p_addr2cmd(nor, from, flash->command);
>>  
>>      t[0].tx_buf = flash->command;
>> +    t[0].tx_nbits = inst_nbits;
>>      t[0].len = m25p_cmdsz(nor) + dummy;
>>      spi_message_add_tail(&t[0], &m);
>>  
>> -    t[1].rx_buf = buf;
>> -    t[1].rx_nbits = m25p80_rx_nbits(nor);
>> -    t[1].len = min3(len, spi_max_transfer_size(spi),
>> -                    spi_max_message_size(spi) - t[0].len);
>> -    spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
>> +    /*
>> +     * Set all dummy/mode cycle bits to avoid sending some manufacturer
>> +     * specific pattern, which might make the memory enter its Continuous
>> +     * Read mode by mistake.
>> +     * Based on the different mode cycle bit patterns listed and described
>> +     * in the JESD216B speficication, the 0xff value works for all memories
>                            ^
>                            specification, typo
> 

good catch :)

Best regards,

Cyrille

>> +     * and all manufacturers.
>> +     */
>> +    cmd_sz = t[0].len;
>> +    memset(flash->command + cmd_sz - dummy, 0xff, dummy);
>> +
>> +    /* split the op code and address bytes into two transfers if needed. */
>> +    data_idx = 1;
>> +    if (addr_nbits != inst_nbits) {
>> +            t[0].len = 1;
>> +
>> +            t[1].tx_buf = &flash->command[1];
>> +            t[1].tx_nbits = addr_nbits;
>> +            t[1].len = cmd_sz - 1;
>> +            spi_message_add_tail(&t[1], &m);
>> +
>> +            data_idx = 2;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    t[data_idx].rx_buf = buf;
>> +    t[data_idx].rx_nbits = data_nbits;
>> +    t[data_idx].len = min3(len, spi_max_transfer_size(spi),
>> +                           spi_max_message_size(spi) - cmd_sz);
>> +    spi_message_add_tail(&t[data_idx], &m);
>>  
>>      ret = spi_sync(spi, &m);
>>      if (ret)
>>              return ret;
>>  
>> -    ret = m.actual_length - m25p_cmdsz(nor) - dummy;
>> +    ret = m.actual_length - cmd_sz;
>>      if (ret < 0)
>>              return -EIO;
>>      return ret;
>> @@ -223,11 +274,20 @@ static int m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>>      spi_set_drvdata(spi, flash);
>>      flash->spi = spi;
>>  
>> -    if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_QUAD)
>> +    if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_QUAD) {
>>              hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_4;
>> -    else if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_DUAL)
>> +
>> +            if (spi->mode & SPI_TX_QUAD)
>> +                    hwcaps.mask |= (SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_4_4 |
>> +                                    SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_1_1_4 |
>> +                                    SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_1_4_4);
>> +    } else if (spi->mode & SPI_RX_DUAL) {
>>              hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_1_2;
>>  
>> +            if (spi->mode & SPI_TX_DUAL)
>> +                    hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_1_2_2;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      if (data && data->name)
>>              nor->mtd.name = data->name;
>>  
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to