On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:10:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rost...@goodmis.org>
> 
> The updates to the trace_active per cpu variable can be updated with the
> __this_cpu_*() functions as it only gets updated on the CPU that the variable
> is on.
> 
> Thanks to Paul McKenney for suggesting __this_cpu_* instead of this_cpu_*.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_stack.c | 23 +++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> index 5fb1f2c87e6b..338d076a06da 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -207,13 +207,12 @@ stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long 
> parent_ip,
>                struct ftrace_ops *op, struct pt_regs *pt_regs)
>  {
>       unsigned long stack;
> -     int cpu;
> 
>       preempt_disable_notrace();
> 
> -     cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>       /* no atomic needed, we only modify this variable by this cpu */
> -     if (per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)++ != 0)
> +     __this_cpu_inc(trace_active);
> +     if (__this_cpu_read(trace_active) != 1)
>               goto out;
> 
>       ip += MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE;
> @@ -221,7 +220,7 @@ stack_trace_call(unsigned long ip, unsigned long 
> parent_ip,
>       check_stack(ip, &stack);
> 
>   out:
> -     per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)--;
> +     __this_cpu_dec(trace_active);
>       /* prevent recursion in schedule */
>       preempt_enable_notrace();
>  }
> @@ -253,7 +252,6 @@ stack_max_size_write(struct file *filp, const char __user 
> *ubuf,
>       long *ptr = filp->private_data;
>       unsigned long val, flags;
>       int ret;
> -     int cpu;
> 
>       ret = kstrtoul_from_user(ubuf, count, 10, &val);
>       if (ret)
> @@ -266,14 +264,13 @@ stack_max_size_write(struct file *filp, const char 
> __user *ubuf,
>        * we will cause circular lock, so we also need to increase
>        * the percpu trace_active here.
>        */
> -     cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -     per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)++;
> +     __this_cpu_inc(trace_active);
> 
>       arch_spin_lock(&stack_trace_max_lock);
>       *ptr = val;
>       arch_spin_unlock(&stack_trace_max_lock);
> 
> -     per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)--;
> +     __this_cpu_dec(trace_active);
>       local_irq_restore(flags);
> 
>       return count;
> @@ -307,12 +304,9 @@ t_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
> 
>  static void *t_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -     int cpu;
> -
>       local_irq_disable();
> 
> -     cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -     per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)++;
> +     __this_cpu_inc(trace_active);
> 
>       arch_spin_lock(&stack_trace_max_lock);
> 
> @@ -324,12 +318,9 @@ static void *t_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> 
>  static void t_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
>  {
> -     int cpu;
> -
>       arch_spin_unlock(&stack_trace_max_lock);
> 
> -     cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -     per_cpu(trace_active, cpu)--;
> +     __this_cpu_dec(trace_active);
> 
>       local_irq_enable();
>  }
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 
> 

Reply via email to