On (04/10/17 20:48), Pavel Machek wrote: [..] > > but, once again, I see your point. > > Good. Does that mean that the next version of patches will work ok in > that case?
yes.
we also likely will get rid of printk_begin/end in PM code.
but we still need to have printk_emergency hints from the
outside world in the rest of the places (sysrq etc.) :(
-ss
