On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Djalal Harouni <tix...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Casey Schaufler <ca...@schaufler-ca.com> > wrote: >> I think that would be the prudent approach. There is still >> the possibility that blob sharing (or full stacking, if you >> prefer) won't be accepted any time soon. > > Ok Casey! I will wait for more feedback, and if other maintainers do > not object, I will convert it back to rhashtables in next iterations > making sure that it should be simple to convert later to a blob > sharing mechanism.
Would it be possible just to add a single field to task_struct if this LSM is built in? I feel like rhashtables is a huge overhead when a single field is all that's needed. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
