On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:59:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Objects of "struct cpufreq_cooling_device" are named a bit > inconsistently. Lets use cpufreq_dev everywhere. >
Naming is always a matter of taste.. but I frankly cannot see how this patch improves anything here. cpufreq_dev is still misleading. Here other options: cpufreq_cooling_dev: not misleading but, may a bit too long.. cpufreq_cdev: better, but still, not a char dev > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
