On 11-04-17, 10:33, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:59:38AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Objects of "struct cpufreq_cooling_device" are named a bit > > inconsistently. Lets use cpufreq_dev everywhere. > > > > Naming is always a matter of taste.. but I frankly cannot see how this > patch improves anything here. cpufreq_dev is still misleading.
I wasn't trying to get to a better name, but rather be consistent. > Here other options: > cpufreq_cooling_dev: not misleading but, may a bit too long.. > cpufreq_cdev: better, but still, not a char dev I will go for the second one. -- viresh
