On 2017-04-13 18:10, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2017-04-13 16:24, Philipp Zabel wrote: >> According to the device tree binding documentation, the compatible >> should be "gpio-mux", not "mux-gpio". >> >> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]> >> --- >> drivers/mux/mux-gpio.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mux/mux-gpio.c b/drivers/mux/mux-gpio.c >> index b304845c4812b..227d3572e6dbf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mux/mux-gpio.c >> +++ b/drivers/mux/mux-gpio.c >> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static const struct mux_control_ops mux_gpio_ops = { >> }; >> >> static const struct of_device_id mux_gpio_dt_ids[] = { >> - { .compatible = "mux-gpio", }, >> + { .compatible = "gpio-mux", }, >> { /* sentinel */ } >> }; >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mux_gpio_dt_ids); >> > > Oh, crap, right you are. However, the mux patch series is not frozen yet, > and I think Greg KH will want this fixed before they are. So, I guess I'll > send a v11 of the mux series (shortly) instead of having this extra patch.
Should be v13 of course.... > Cheers, > peda >
