On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:27:28 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Steve, > > Sorry for little late, > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:44:26 +0900 > > Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> This patchset add 'function-fork' option to function tracer which > >> makes pid filter to be inherited like 'event-fork' does. During the > >> test, I found a bug of pid filter on an instance directory. The patch > >> 1 fixes it and maybe it should go to the stable tree. > > > > Hmm, are the other patches dependent on it? > > Nop, but there will be a small clash on trace.h for the declaration. Yep, I push up a merge with mainline with my linux-next branch to cover the conflicts. I'll let Linus know about it too when I do my pull request in the merge window. > > > > > I think I may just push it separately to Linus now, but the other > > patches will be on my devel branch which will not be abased off of this > > fix. Will that break too much? I just cherry-picked a patch from my > > urgent branch as it required to be on my devel branch and go to Linus. > > I don't think it breaks much. Except that your test triggers the bug it uncovered ;-) -- Steve > > > > > Hmm, I may be able to make a separate branch with this. I have to see > > how much it conflicts with my current development.
