On 24-04-17, 17:53, Lukasz Luba wrote: > The policy pointer forwarded from cpufreq_update_policy() > is a local variable 'new_policy' so cannot be compared with pinned > policy pointer in the cooling device. > You should do the cpumask test like before: > if (!cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu, > cpufreq_cdev->policy->related_cpus))
Right. I have fixed it a bit differently now. > But there is something still in the patch set... > I will try to check it tomorrow. I reviewed all the patches very carefully again, trying to find out the culprit (I don't have the right hardware to test it like you have). Found out that max_level isn't used properly at few places, fixed and pushed my branch now. See if it works fine now. HEAD: 6a883ddf73cd -- viresh
