Hi Viresh,
I have run the newest version (6a883ddf73cd).
It looks correct (tests are passing so far).
Feel free to add
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
I would like to go through the code before
it got merged, though.
If you are planing to post v4, I can test and review it
this week.
Regards,
Lukasz
On 25/04/17 05:57, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 24-04-17, 17:53, Lukasz Luba wrote:
The policy pointer forwarded from cpufreq_update_policy()
is a local variable 'new_policy' so cannot be compared with pinned
policy pointer in the cooling device.
You should do the cpumask test like before:
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(policy->cpu,
cpufreq_cdev->policy->related_cpus))
Right. I have fixed it a bit differently now.
But there is something still in the patch set...
I will try to check it tomorrow.
I reviewed all the patches very carefully again, trying to find out the culprit
(I don't have the right hardware to test it like you have).
Found out that max_level isn't used properly at few places, fixed and pushed my
branch now. See if it works fine now.
HEAD: 6a883ddf73cd
