From: Sunil Goutham <sgout...@cavium.com>

Modified polling on CMDQ consumer similar to how polling is done for TLB SYNC
completion in SMMUv2 driver. Code changes are done with reference to

8513c8930069 iommu/arm-smmu: Poll for TLB sync completion more effectively

Poll timeout has been increased which addresses issue of 100us timeout not
sufficient, when command queue is full with TLB invalidation commands.

Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgout...@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Geetha <gak...@cavium.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d412bdd..34599d4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -379,6 +379,9 @@
 #define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_NONE            (0UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
 #define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV             (2UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
 
+#define CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US          1000
+#define CMDQ_SPIN_COUNT                        10
+
 /* Event queue */
 #define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS                        4
 #define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT              7
@@ -737,7 +740,8 @@ static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
  */
 static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
 {
-       ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
+       ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US);
+       unsigned int spin_cnt, delay = 1;
 
        while (queue_sync_cons(q), (drain ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
                if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
@@ -746,8 +750,13 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool 
drain, bool wfe)
                if (wfe) {
                        wfe();
                } else {
-                       cpu_relax();
-                       udelay(1);
+                       for (spin_cnt = 0;
+                            spin_cnt < CMDQ_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt++) {
+                               cpu_relax();
+                               continue;
+                       }
+                       udelay(delay);
+                       delay *= 2;
                }
        }
 
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to