Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm

[Ingo Molnar]

* Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote:

> On Sun, 7 May 2017, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >  /* context.lock is held for us, so we don't need any locking. */
> >  static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
> >  {
> > +   struct mm_struct *mm = current_mm;
> >     mm_context_t *pc;
> >  
> > -   if (current->active_mm != current_mm)
> > +   if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) != current_mm)
> 
> While functional correct, this really should compare against 'mm'.
> 
> >             return;
> >  
> > -   pc = &current->active_mm->context;
> > +   pc = &mm->context;

So this appears to be the function:

 static void flush_ldt(void *current_mm)
 {
        struct mm_struct *mm = current_mm;
        mm_context_t *pc;

        if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm) != current_mm)
                return;

        pc = &mm->context;
        set_ldt(pc->ldt->entries, pc->ldt->size);
 }

why not rename 'current_mm' to 'mm' and remove the 'mm' local variable?

Thanks,

        Ingo