Hi Chen-Yu,
Thank you for the review!
On 03/05/2017 19:13, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Mylène Josserand
<mylene.josser...@free-electrons.com> wrote:
Add ADC support for the sun8i-codec driver.
This driver uses all the microphones widgets and routes provided by the
analog part (sun8i-codec-analog).
Some digital configurations are needed by creating new ADC widgets
and routes.
Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand <mylene.josser...@free-electrons.com>
---
sound/soc/sunxi/sun8i-codec.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun8i-codec.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun8i-codec.c
index 5723c3404f6b..b4938b06acec 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun8i-codec.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun8i-codec.c
@@ -37,9 +37,11 @@
#define SUN8I_SYSCLK_CTL_SYSCLK_SRC 0
#define SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA 0x010
#define SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA_AIF1 15
+#define SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA_ADC 3
#define SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA_DAC 2
#define SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL 0x014
#define SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL_AIF1 15
+#define SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL_ADC 3
#define SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL_DAC 2
#define SUN8I_SYS_SR_CTRL 0x018
#define SUN8I_SYS_SR_CTRL_AIF1_FS 12
@@ -54,9 +56,25 @@
#define SUN8I_AIF1CLK_CTRL_AIF1_WORD_SIZ 4
#define SUN8I_AIF1CLK_CTRL_AIF1_WORD_SIZ_16 (1 << 4)
#define SUN8I_AIF1CLK_CTRL_AIF1_DATA_FMT 2
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL 0x044
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0L_ENA 15
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0R_ENA 14
#define SUN8I_AIF1_DACDAT_CTRL 0x048
#define SUN8I_AIF1_DACDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0L_ENA 15
#define SUN8I_AIF1_DACDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0R_ENA 14
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC 0x04c
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_AIF1DA0L 15
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_AIF2DACL 14
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_ADCL 13
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_AIF2DACR 12
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_AIF1DA0R 11
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_AIF2DACR 10
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_ADCR 9
+#define SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_AIF2DACL 8
+#define SUN8I_ADC_DIG_CTRL 0x100
+#define SUN8I_ADC_DIG_CTRL_ENDA 15
The register bit name in the manual is ENAD, as in ENable ADc.
Okay, I did not know that, thanks.
+#define SUN8I_ADC_DIG_CTRL_ADOUT_DTS 2
+#define SUN8I_ADC_DIG_CTRL_ADOUT_DLY 1
#define SUN8I_DAC_DIG_CTRL 0x120
#define SUN8I_DAC_DIG_CTRL_ENDA 15
#define SUN8I_DAC_MXR_SRC 0x130
@@ -276,10 +294,28 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new
sun8i_dac_mixer_controls[] = {
SUN8I_DAC_MXR_SRC_DACR_MXR_SRC_ADCR, 1, 0),
};
+static const struct snd_kcontrol_new sun8i_input_mixer_controls[] = {
+ SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE("AIF1 Slot 0 Digital ADC Capture Switch",
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_AIF1DA0L,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_AIF1DA0R, 1, 0),
+ SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE("AIF2 Digital ADC Capture Switch", SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_AIF2DACL,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_AIF2DACR, 1, 0),
+ SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE("AIF1 Data Digital ADC Capture Switch",
SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_ADCL,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_ADCR, 1, 0),
+ SOC_DAPM_DOUBLE("AIF2 Inv Digital ADC Capture Switch",
SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0L_MXL_SRC_AIF2DACR,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_MXR_SRC_AD0R_MXR_SRC_AIF2DACL, 1, 0),
+};
This group of mixer controls is only for AIF1 slot 0 capture.
So in fact they should all read "AIF1 Slot 0 Mixer X Capture Switch",
with X replaced by "AIF1 Slot 0", "AIF2", "ADC", and "AIF2 Inv".
This hopefully informs the user that these controls are for the AIF1
slot 0 mixer, and are capture switch from the various sources listed
above.
Sounds good.
+
static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget sun8i_codec_dapm_widgets[] = {
- /* Digital parts of the DACs */
+ /* Digital parts of the DACs and ADC */
SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("DAC", SUN8I_DAC_DIG_CTRL, SUN8I_DAC_DIG_CTRL_ENDA,
0, NULL, 0),
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("ADC", SUN8I_ADC_DIG_CTRL, SUN8I_ADC_DIG_CTRL_ENDA,
+ 0, NULL, 0),
/* Analog DAC AIF */
SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("AIF1 Slot 0 Left", "Playback", 0,
@@ -289,17 +325,31 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget
sun8i_codec_dapm_widgets[] = {
SUN8I_AIF1_DACDAT_CTRL,
SUN8I_AIF1_DACDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0R_ENA, 0),
- /* DAC Mixers */
+ /* Analog ADC AIF */
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("AIF1 Slot 0 Left ADC", "Capture", 0,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0L_ENA, 0),
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("AIF1 Slot 0 Right ADC", "Capture", 0,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL,
+ SUN8I_AIF1_ADCDAT_CTRL_AIF1_DA0R_ENA, 0),
You want to use SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_OUT here, for captured audio out of
the codec and to the system. These are the last widgets in the capture
path.
ACK
+
+ /* DAC and ADC Mixers */
SOC_MIXER_ARRAY("Left Digital DAC Mixer", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0,
sun8i_dac_mixer_controls),
SOC_MIXER_ARRAY("Right Digital DAC Mixer", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0,
sun8i_dac_mixer_controls),
+ SOC_MIXER_ARRAY("Left Digital ADC Mixer", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0,
+ sun8i_input_mixer_controls),
+ SOC_MIXER_ARRAY("Right Digital ADC Mixer", SND_SOC_NOPM, 0, 0,
+ sun8i_input_mixer_controls),
And these should read "AIF1 Slot 0 Left/Right Mixer".
ACK
/* Clocks */
SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("MODCLK AFI1", SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA,
SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA_AIF1, 0, NULL, 0),
SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("MODCLK DAC", SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA,
SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA_DAC, 0, NULL, 0),
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("MODCLK ADC", SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA,
+ SUN8I_MOD_CLK_ENA_ADC, 0, NULL, 0),
SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("AIF1", SUN8I_SYSCLK_CTL,
SUN8I_SYSCLK_CTL_AIF1CLK_ENA, 0, NULL, 0),
SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("SYSCLK", SUN8I_SYSCLK_CTL,
@@ -316,6 +366,12 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_widget
sun8i_codec_dapm_widgets[] = {
SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL_AIF1, 0, NULL, 0),
SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("RST DAC", SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL,
SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL_DAC, 0, NULL, 0),
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_SUPPLY("RST ADC", SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL,
+ SUN8I_MOD_RST_CTL_ADC, 0, NULL, 0),
+
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_MIC("Headset Mic", NULL),
+ SND_SOC_DAPM_MIC("Mic", NULL),
These Mics are board level widgets. Since you are using simple-card,
you should add them in the device tree in the simple-card device
node, using the "simple-audio-card,widgets" property.
You probably should have done so for the output side as well.
If simple-card were fully-routed, the existing device tree simply
wouldn't work.
Okay, I will add them in the simple-audio-card node.
+
};
static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route sun8i_codec_dapm_routes[] = {
@@ -325,11 +381,16 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route
sun8i_codec_dapm_routes[] = {
{ "RST AIF1", NULL, "AIF1 PLL" },
{ "MODCLK AFI1", NULL, "RST AIF1" },
{ "DAC", NULL, "MODCLK AFI1" },
+ { "ADC", NULL, "MODCLK AFI1" },
This makes no sense. Why would AIF1's module clock feed the ADC? Same goes
for the existing DAC route.
It was difficult for me to know how to route the clocks with the DAC/ADC
widgets. As the clocks are needed to have a ADC/DAC working, I created
this route but it is, maybe, not the correct way to do it.
{ "RST DAC", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
{ "MODCLK DAC", NULL, "RST DAC" },
{ "DAC", NULL, "MODCLK DAC" },
+ { "RST ADC", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
+ { "MODCLK ADC", NULL, "RST ADC" },
+ { "ADC", NULL, "MODCLK ADC" },
This makes little sense either. The SYSCLK probably feeds the ADC's
module clock.
The MODCLK then feeds the ADC. The ADC reset feeds the ADC (or rather the ADC
depends on its reset). The "ADC" widget here is actually just the enable switch.
But we can use it as a kind of placeholder, to setup the dependencies correctly.
Yep, that it is.
What do you have in mind about the ADC widget as a "placeholder"?
I wish we had named the widgets better, but alas they are part of the
device tree
binding, even though they are not documented, so we can not change the existing
ones.
I agree about the widgets names, they are not very clear.
+
/* DAC Routes */
{ "AIF1 Slot 0 Right", NULL, "DAC" },
{ "AIF1 Slot 0 Left", NULL, "DAC" },
@@ -339,6 +400,12 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route
sun8i_codec_dapm_routes[] = {
"AIF1 Slot 0 Left"},
{ "Right Digital DAC Mixer", "AIF1 Slot 0 Digital DAC Playback Switch",
"AIF1 Slot 0 Right"},
+
+ /* ADC routes */
+ { "Left Digital ADC Mixer", "AIF1 Data Digital ADC Capture Switch",
+ "AIF1 Slot 0 Left ADC" },
+ { "Right Digital ADC Mixer", "AIF1 Data Digital ADC Capture Switch",
+ "AIF1 Slot 0 Right ADC" },
Same thing about the "ADC Mixer" names.
And these routes are completely backwards. "AIF1 Slot 0 Left/Right ADC" are
the output stream widgets. They are fed from "AIF1 Slot 0 Left/Right Mixer"
if you use the names I suggested, or "Left/Right Digital ADC Mixer" originally.
You are right, it make sense now.
You then need other routes feeding the mixer. Looks like you also need ADC
placeholder widgets on the digital side here, so you can hook up the analog
side in simple-card more easily.
Okay, I will try to improve it.
If you can, please dump the DAPM routes into a directed graph to check
everything
is connected and makes sense. I believe you have a script that does this.
Yes, I tested it and the ADC mixers are connected to nothing so this
route does not make sense. I will rework it.
};
static struct snd_soc_dai_ops sun8i_codec_dai_ops = {
@@ -356,6 +423,15 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_driver sun8i_codec_dai = {
.rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000,
.formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE,
},
+ /* capture capabilities */
+ .capture = {
+ .stream_name = "Capture",
+ .channels_min = 1,
+ .channels_max = 2,
+ .rates = SNDRV_PCM_RATE_8000_192000,
+ .formats = SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE,
+ .sig_bits = 24,
+ },
/* pcm operations */
.ops = &sun8i_codec_dai_ops,
};
--
2.11.0
Thank you again,
Best regards,
--
Mylène Josserand, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
