From: SF Markus Elfring
> Sent: 09 May 2017 15:22
> A bit of data was put into a sequence by two separate function calls.
> Print the same data by a single function call instead.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
> index b6891ada1d7b..542f1e511df1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c
> @@ -830,8 +830,7 @@ static int yam_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
>       seq_printf(seq, "  RxFrames %lu\n", dev->stats.rx_packets);
>       seq_printf(seq, "  TxInt    %u\n", yp->nb_mdint);
>       seq_printf(seq, "  RxInt    %u\n", yp->nb_rxint);
> -     seq_printf(seq, "  RxOver   %lu\n", dev->stats.rx_fifo_errors);
> -     seq_printf(seq, "\n");
> +     seq_printf(seq, "  RxOver   %lu\n\n", dev->stats.rx_fifo_errors);
>       return 0;

The code was consistently (and probably deliberately) using one seq_printf()
call for each line so that the source looks 'a bit like' the output.

These changes are all stupid.

        David

Reply via email to