On 11/05/2017 02:56, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> Hmm, thinking more about it, maybe use mxcsr_feature_mask instead of >> digging into vcpu->arch.guest_fpu? If you send v2, please remember to > ERROR: "mxcsr_feature_mask" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined. So we > should dig into vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.
Yes, you need to export it. Paolo
