On 11-05-17, 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > gcc-7 warns about some declarations that are more 'const' than necessary: > > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:338:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration > specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier] > static const struct of_device_id const ramc_ids[] __initconst = { > arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:36:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration > specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier] > static const struct of_device_id const bcm_kona_smc_ids[] __initconst = { > arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c:207:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration > specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier] > static const struct of_device_id const timer_of_match[] __initconst = { > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c:714:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration > specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier] > static const struct of_device_id const omap_prcm_dt_match_table[] > __initconst = { > arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c:562:35: error: duplicate 'const' declaration > specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier] > static const struct i2c_init_data const omap4_i2c_timing_data[] __initconst > = { > > The ones in arch/arm were apparently all introduced accidentally by one > commit that correctly marked a lot of variables as __initconst. > > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <n...@linaro.org> > Fixes: 19c233b79d1a ("ARM: appropriate __init annotation for const data") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > --- > arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh