Hi Boris, 2017-05-18 16:09 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>:
>> >> One question about this part. >> >> >> /* If chip->ecc.size is already set, respect it. */ >> if (chip->ecc.size && step_size != chip->ecc.size) >> continue; >> >> Does this make sense for nand_try_to_maximize_ecc()? >> >> (In other words, can nand-ecc-maximize stand together with >> nand-ecc-step-size?) > > It could make sense if one wants to maximize the strength for a > specific step-size, but most of the time the user will let the driver > choose the best step-size+strength pair. OK. I am keeping it here, but I do not have a strong opinion about this. I will follow your decision. Thanks. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
