The vmap RB tree store the elements in order and no overlap between any of
them. The comparison in __insert_vmap_area() is to decide which direction
the search should follow and make sure the new vmap_area is not overlap
with any other.

Current implementation fails to do the overlap check.

When first "if" is not true, it means

    va->va_start >= tmp_va->va_end

And with the truth

    xxx->va_end > xxx->va_start

The deduction is

    va->va_end > tmp_va->va_start

which is the condition in second "if".

This patch changes a little of the comparison in __insert_vmap_area() to
make sure it forbids the overlapped vmap_area.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiy...@gmail.com>
---
 mm/vmalloc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0b057628a7ba..8087451cb332 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ static void __insert_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
 
                parent = *p;
                tmp_va = rb_entry(parent, struct vmap_area, rb_node);
-               if (va->va_start < tmp_va->va_end)
+               if (va->va_end <= tmp_va->va_start)
                        p = &(*p)->rb_left;
-               else if (va->va_end > tmp_va->va_start)
+               else if (va->va_start >= tmp_va->va_end)
                        p = &(*p)->rb_right;
                else
                        BUG();
-- 
2.11.0

Reply via email to