* Davide Libenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays
> > > has probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks
> > > :/
> >
> > Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group,
> > or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names.
>
> Almost *anything* is better than "signal_struct" ;) A task_group could
> be fine, so something on the line of task_shared_ctx.
or lets just face it and name it what it is: process_struct ;-)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
