On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:48:09AM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 05/30/2017 11:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This should be stored as a uuid_t (or rather uuid_be in the current > > kernel, but I'm about to rename it), and use uuid_be_to_bin / uuid_to_bin > > for parsing. > > OK, thought you ask me to do that. Which one do you prefer?
I think you'll have to use the old names, unless we get the uuid changes stabilized soon and can pull the branch for it into the nvme / block tree. So go with those for now, and I'll do any after the fact cleanup later.