> I saw several companies who ship their embedded devices with > single-function LSM modules (e.g. restrict only mount operation and > ptrace operation). What is unfortunate is that their LSM modules had > never been proposed for upstream, and thus bugs remained unnoticed.
So which of them cannot be done with seccomp ? We have a small tight interface for simple things like restricting a few calls. > via lack of ability to use LKM-based LSM modules). My customers cannot afford > enabling SELinux, but my customers cannot rebuild their kernels because > rebuilding makes it even more difficult to get help from support centers. And "I've loaded this third party module" doesn't ? Alan
