Hi Stephen, Thanks for your applying.
There are other two patches sent on April 6, 2017: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9665973/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9665977/ Hope they are in your review queue. Please give it a review. Regards, Andy -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Boyd [mailto:sb...@codeaurora.org] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:28 PM To: Andy Tang <andy.t...@nxp.com> Cc: mturque...@baylibre.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] clk: qoriq: Separate root input clock for core PLLs on ls1012a On 03/20, Yuantian Tang wrote: > From: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net> > > ls1012a has separate input root clocks for core PLLs versus the > platform PLL, with the latter described as sysclk in the hw docs. > If a second input clock, named "coreclk", is present, this clock will > be used for the core PLLs. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net> > Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <andy.t...@nxp.com> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
