On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:12:32 +0200
Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu 2017-06-01 01:09:17, Darwin Dingel wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> > 
> > Just a minor thing. Sorry about the late comment.
> > 
> > On 01/06/17 08:59, Pavel Machek wrote:  
> > > +
> > > +         res = check_erased_page(chip, buf);
> > > +         return res;
> > > + }  
> > 
> > Can we just remove 'res' and change this line to:
> >     return check_erased_page(chip, buf);  
> 
> Well... I originally had a printk there, and yes, it can be
> simplified. I can roll v3, if required, but I'd leave it as is -- it
> is still convenient place to add debugging to.

I can fix it when applying, no need to send a new version.

Regards,

Boris

Reply via email to