Re: Defective Red Hat Distribution poorly represents Linux

[John Jasen]

On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Charles Turner, Ph.D. wrote:

> (4)   For those who think the hardware is broken; The hardware worked
>       for six months using Windows/2000. It has a NT core.

On this note, I recall a time that I 'appropriated' a workstation for
linux.

It was pulled out of the student labs, where it had worked for 3 months
running NT 4.0, but the RH install kept on crashing out.

I could even reinstall NT 4.0.

*shrug*

Eventually traced it down to memory, and had our hardware hacks replace
it.

Sometimes hardware problems can be subtle.

--
-- John E. Jasen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- Some elections you just can't buy. For others, there's GORE 2000

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/