On 05/18/2017 06:52 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Arm64 has 256TB address space so fix the test to pass on Arm as well.
> 
> Also remove unneeded numaif header.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <[email protected]>

Thanks. Applied to linux-kselftest next for 4.13-rc1

-- Shuah

> ---
> v2:
>  - do not test high slices on Arm64 - it has no support and none is planned
>  - fix the hint calculation for different shift
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c | 35 
> ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> index 3b02aa6eb9da..1830d66a6f0e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/virtual_address_range.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <unistd.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
> -#include <numaif.h>
>  #include <sys/mman.h>
>  #include <sys/time.h>
>  
> @@ -32,15 +31,33 @@
>   * different areas one below 128TB and one above 128TB
>   * till it reaches 512TB. One with size 128TB and the
>   * other being 384TB.
> + *
> + * On Arm64 the address space is 256TB and no high mappings
> + * are supported so far.
>   */
> +
>  #define NR_CHUNKS_128TB   8192UL /* Number of 16GB chunks for 128TB */
> -#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB  24576UL /* Number of 16GB chunks for 384TB */
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_256TB   (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 2UL)
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_384TB   (NR_CHUNKS_128TB * 3UL)
>  
>  #define ADDR_MARK_128TB  (1UL << 47) /* First address beyond 128TB */
> +#define ADDR_MARK_256TB  (1UL << 48) /* First address beyond 256TB */
> +
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK  ADDR_MARK_256TB
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 49
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW   NR_CHUNKS_256TB
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH  0
> +#else
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_MARK  ADDR_MARK_128TB
> +#define HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT 48
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_LOW   NR_CHUNKS_128TB
> +#define NR_CHUNKS_HIGH  NR_CHUNKS_384TB
> +#endif
>  
>  static char *hind_addr(void)
>  {
> -     int bits = 48 + rand() % 15;
> +     int bits = HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT + rand() % (63 - HIGH_ADDR_SHIFT);
>  
>       return (char *) (1UL << bits);
>  }
> @@ -50,14 +67,14 @@ static int validate_addr(char *ptr, int high_addr)
>       unsigned long addr = (unsigned long) ptr;
>  
>       if (high_addr) {
> -             if (addr < ADDR_MARK_128TB) {
> +             if (addr < HIGH_ADDR_MARK) {
>                       printf("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
>                       return 1;
>               }
>               return 0;
>       }
>  
> -     if (addr > ADDR_MARK_128TB) {
> +     if (addr > HIGH_ADDR_MARK) {
>               printf("Bad address %lx\n", addr);
>               return 1;
>       }
> @@ -79,12 +96,12 @@ static int validate_lower_address_hint(void)
>  
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  {
> -     char *ptr[NR_CHUNKS_128TB];
> -     char *hptr[NR_CHUNKS_384TB];
> +     char *ptr[NR_CHUNKS_LOW];
> +     char *hptr[NR_CHUNKS_HIGH];
>       char *hint;
>       unsigned long i, lchunks, hchunks;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_128TB; i++) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_LOW; i++) {
>               ptr[i] = mmap(NULL, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>                                       MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>  
> @@ -99,7 +116,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>       }
>       lchunks = i;
>  
> -     for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_384TB; i++) {
> +     for (i = 0; i < NR_CHUNKS_HIGH; i++) {
>               hint = hind_addr();
>               hptr[i] = mmap(hint, MAP_CHUNK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>                                       MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
> 

Reply via email to