On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:17:23PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> lruvecs are at the intersection of the NUMA node and memcg, which is
> the scope for most paging activity.
>
> Introduce a convenient accounting infrastructure that maintains
> statistics per node, per memcg, and the lruvec itself.
>
> Then convert over accounting sites for statistics that are already
> tracked in both nodes and memcgs and can be easily switched.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 238
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> include/linux/vmstat.h | 1 -
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++
> mm/page-writeback.c | 15 +--
> mm/rmap.c | 8 +-
> mm/workingset.c | 9 +-
> 6 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 9c68a40c83e3..e37908606c0f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4122,6 +4122,12 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_node_info(struct
> mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
> if (!pn)
> return 1;
>
> + pn->lruvec_stat = alloc_percpu(struct lruvec_stat);
> + if (!pn->lruvec_stat) {
> + kfree(pn);
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> lruvec_init(&pn->lruvec);
> pn->usage_in_excess = 0;
> pn->on_tree = false;
I don't see the matching free_percpu() anywhere, forget to patch
free_mem_cgroup_per_node_info()?
Other than that and with the follow-up fix applied, this patch
is good IMO.
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov....@gmail.com>
