On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Colin King <colin.k...@canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>
> The check on ret < 0 is redundant as the goto destination is the
> next statment. Remove this redudant check and goto.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1268785 ("Identical code for different
> branches")
> ret = max8925_reg_write(info->rtc, MAX8925_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x77);
> else
> ret = max8925_reg_write(info->rtc, MAX8925_ALARM0_CNTL, 0x0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out;
> out:
> return ret;
...and label (w/ replacing it by inplace return ret;) ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
