On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:46 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:55:54PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * find the upstream PCIE-to-PCI bridge of a PCI device
> > + * if the device is PCIE, return NULL
> > + * if the device isn't connected to a PCIE bridge (that is its parent is a
> > + * legacy PCI bridge and the bridge is directly connected to bus 0), 
> > return its
> > + * parent
> > + */
> > +struct pci_dev *
> > +pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +   struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
> > +
> > +   if (pdev->is_pcie)
> > +           return NULL;
> > +   while (1) {
> > +           if (!pdev->bus->self)
> > +                   break;
> > +           pdev = pdev->bus->self;
> > +           /* a p2p bridge */
> > +           if (!pdev->is_pcie) {
> > +                   tmp = pdev;
> > +                   continue;
> > +           }
> > +           /* PCI device should connect to a PCIE bridge */
> > +           BUG_ON(pdev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE);
> > +           return pdev;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return tmp;
> > +}
> 
> No locking while you walk up the bus list?
hmm, iommu driver didn't support pci hotplug in current stage. But we can add 
lock here.

> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/include/linux/pci.h       2007-04-03 
> > 04:30:51.000000000 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/include/linux/pci.h    2007-04-03 06:58:58.000000000 
> > -0700
> > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
> >     unsigned short  subsystem_device;
> >     unsigned int    class;          /* 3 bytes: (base,sub,prog-if) */
> >     u8              hdr_type;       /* PCI header type (`multi' flag masked 
> > out) */
> > +   u8              pcie_type;      /* PCI-E device/port type */
> >     u8              rom_base_reg;   /* which config register controls the 
> > ROM */
> >     u8              pin;            /* which interrupt pin this device uses 
> > */
> >  
> > @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@
> >     unsigned int    msi_enabled:1;
> >     unsigned int    msix_enabled:1;
> >     unsigned int    is_managed:1;
> > +   unsigned int    is_pcie:1;
> 
> Do you really need both fields?  Wouldn't just the pcie_type one work
> (with some NOT_PCIE type being set for it if it isn't I suppose.)
There are some encodings are reserved for future. Just don't want to use
reserved bits, as we don't know which one is proper for NOT_PCIE.

Thanks,
Shaohua
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to