On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday 16 June 2017 15:35:39 Kai-Heng Feng wrote:

>> -     if (kbd_token_bits != 0 || ret == 0)
>> +     /*
>> +      * If KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN is the only token,
>> +      * consider there is no keyboard backlight.
>> +      */
>> +     if ((kbd_token_bits & ~BIT(5)) != 0 || ret == 0)
>
> Should not this check to be rather:
>
> (kbd_token_bits != 0 && (kbd_token_bits & BIT(KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN)) != 
> BIT(KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN))
>
> To express that we have at least one token at it is different from
> KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN token?

Isn't the same to

(kbd_token_bits ^ BIT(KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN))

?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to