On 16/06/17 11:09 PM, 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' wrote: > Ah, but the patchset does seem to properly formatted. At least it's > easy for me to review as-published, while a much smaller number of > patches, making much larger individual patches, would be much much > harder to review. > > But what do I know... > > Oh wait, I review more kernel patches than anyone else :)
Thanks Greg. > Logan, given that you need to rebase these on the "new" ntb api (and why > the hell is that tree on github? We can't take kernel git pulls from > github), is it worth reviewing this patch series as-is, or do you want > us to wait? I think initial review at this time will still be useful. I don't expect the patchset will change _that_ much. Logan
