On 16/06/17 11:09 PM, 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' wrote: > Ah, but the patchset does seem to properly formatted. At least it's > easy for me to review as-published, while a much smaller number of > patches, making much larger individual patches, would be much much > harder to review. > > But what do I know... > > Oh wait, I review more kernel patches than anyone else :)
Thanks Greg! > Logan, given that you need to rebase these on the "new" ntb api (and why > the hell is that tree on github? We can't take kernel git pulls from > github), is it worth reviewing this patch series as-is, or do you want > us to wait? I think review at this time is still appropriate. The new ntb api mostly just adds indexes for the port so I don't expect things to change too much. Thanks for the review so far. Logan
