On 19/06/17 10:14, Magnus Damm wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm+rene...@opensource.se>
> 
> Add root device handling to the IPMMU driver by allowing certain
> DT compat strings to enable has_cache_leaf_nodes that in turn will
> support both root devices with interrupts and leaf devices that
> face the actual IPMMU consumer devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+rene...@opensource.se>
> ---
> 
>  Changes since V3:
>  - Reworked root finding code to make it easier to follow, thanks Geert!
>  
>  Changes since V2:
>  - Fixed a bug in ipmmu_find_root() when only leaf devices are present
>  - Broke out __ipmmu_find_root() to allow ->xlate() check for root devices
> 
>  Changes since V1:
>  - Moved patch to earlier in the series
>  - Updated code to work with recent changes in:
>    [PATCH v3 00/06] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: IPMMU multi-arch update V3
> 
>  drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c |   95 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> --- 0015/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ work/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c   2017-06-19 13:59:41.050607110 +0900
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  
>  struct ipmmu_features {
>       bool use_ns_alias_offset;
> +     bool has_cache_leaf_nodes;
>  };
>  
>  struct ipmmu_vmsa_device {
> @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ struct ipmmu_vmsa_device {
>       struct iommu_device iommu;
>       struct list_head list;
>       const struct ipmmu_features *features;
> +     bool is_leaf;
>       unsigned int num_utlbs;
>       spinlock_t lock;                        /* Protects ctx and domains[] */
>       DECLARE_BITMAP(ctx, IPMMU_CTX_MAX);
> @@ -54,6 +56,7 @@ struct ipmmu_vmsa_device {
>  
>  struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain {
>       struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu;
> +     struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *root;

Would it not make more sense for this to be a property of the
ipmmu_device itself, rather than per ipmmu_domain? I may of course have
got the wrong idea of the topology here, but it seems as if mmu->is_leaf
could be expressed as mmu->root == mmu vs. mmu->root == some_other_mmu,
at which point there's one less thing to worry about in the domain.

>       struct iommu_domain io_domain;
>  
>       struct io_pgtable_cfg cfg;
> @@ -203,6 +206,44 @@ static struct ipmmu_vmsa_iommu_priv *to_
>  #define IMUASID_ASID0_SHIFT          0
>  
>  /* 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + * Root device handling
> + */
> +
> +static bool ipmmu_is_root(struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu)
> +{
> +     if (mmu->features->has_cache_leaf_nodes)
> +             return mmu->is_leaf ? false : true> +   else
> +             return true; /* older IPMMU hardware treated as single root */
> +}
> +
> +static struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *__ipmmu_find_root(void)
> +{
> +     struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu;
> +     struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *root = NULL;
> +
> +     spin_lock(&ipmmu_devices_lock);
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(mmu, &ipmmu_devices, list) {
> +             if (ipmmu_is_root(mmu)) {
> +                     root = mmu;
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     spin_unlock(&ipmmu_devices_lock);
> +     return root;
> +}

I wonder if it might be tidier to use driver_for_each_device() for this,
and remove the local list at the same time as its previous user.

Either way, what happens if things end up hapening in this order:

1: probe leaf IPMMU B
2: probe device X behind IPMMU B
3: create and attach default domain for device X
4: probe root IPMMU A

We know X will defer if B isn't ready, but it doesn't seem (at a glance,
admittedly) that there's anything to enforce the expected probe ordering
between A and B. This seems like another argument for moving the
root/leaf association up to the device level, such that B can look up A
once in its own probe routine, and defer itself if necessary.

> +
> +static struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *ipmmu_find_root(struct ipmmu_vmsa_device 
> *leaf)
> +{
> +     if (ipmmu_is_root(leaf))
> +             return leaf;
> +     else
> +             return __ipmmu_find_root();

Well actually, looking at that, I think what we have here is a very
long-winded way of implementing this:

static ipmmu_vmsa_device *root;

Yuck.

> +}
> +
> +/* 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   * Read/Write Access
>   */
>  
> @@ -219,13 +260,13 @@ static void ipmmu_write(struct ipmmu_vms
>  
>  static u32 ipmmu_ctx_read(struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *domain, unsigned int reg)
>  {
> -     return ipmmu_read(domain->mmu, domain->context_id * IM_CTX_SIZE + reg);
> +     return ipmmu_read(domain->root, domain->context_id * IM_CTX_SIZE + reg);
>  }
>  
>  static void ipmmu_ctx_write(struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *domain, unsigned int 
> reg,
>                           u32 data)
>  {
> -     ipmmu_write(domain->mmu, domain->context_id * IM_CTX_SIZE + reg, data);
> +     ipmmu_write(domain->root, domain->context_id * IM_CTX_SIZE + reg, data);
>  }
>  
>  /* 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -360,7 +401,7 @@ static int ipmmu_domain_init_context(str
>        * TODO: Add support for coherent walk through CCI with DVM and remove
>        * cache handling. For now, delegate it to the io-pgtable code.
>        */
> -     domain->cfg.iommu_dev = domain->mmu->dev;
> +     domain->cfg.iommu_dev = domain->root->dev;
>  
>       domain->iop = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(ARM_32_LPAE_S1, &domain->cfg,
>                                          domain);
> @@ -370,7 +411,7 @@ static int ipmmu_domain_init_context(str
>       /*
>        * Find an unused context.
>        */
> -     ret = ipmmu_domain_allocate_context(domain->mmu, domain);
> +     ret = ipmmu_domain_allocate_context(domain->root, domain);
>       if (ret == IPMMU_CTX_MAX) {
>               free_io_pgtable_ops(domain->iop);
>               return -EBUSY;
> @@ -441,7 +482,7 @@ static void ipmmu_domain_destroy_context
>        */
>       ipmmu_ctx_write(domain, IMCTR, IMCTR_FLUSH);
>       ipmmu_tlb_sync(domain);
> -     ipmmu_domain_free_context(domain->mmu, domain->context_id);
> +     ipmmu_domain_free_context(domain->root, domain->context_id);
>  }
>  
>  /* 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> @@ -555,7 +596,7 @@ static int ipmmu_attach_device(struct io
>  {
>       struct ipmmu_vmsa_iommu_priv *priv = to_priv(dev);
>       struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
> -     struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = priv->mmu;
> +     struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *root, *mmu = priv->mmu;
>       struct ipmmu_vmsa_domain *domain = to_vmsa_domain(io_domain);
>       unsigned long flags;
>       unsigned int i;
> @@ -566,11 +607,18 @@ static int ipmmu_attach_device(struct io
>               return -ENXIO;
>       }
>  
> +     root = ipmmu_find_root(priv->mmu);
> +     if (!root) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Unable to locate root IPMMU\n");
> +             return -EAGAIN;
> +     }
> +
>       spin_lock_irqsave(&domain->lock, flags);
>  
>       if (!domain->mmu) {
>               /* The domain hasn't been used yet, initialize it. */
>               domain->mmu = mmu;
> +             domain->root = root;
>               ret = ipmmu_domain_init_context(domain);
>       } else if (domain->mmu != mmu) {
>               /*
> @@ -911,6 +959,7 @@ static void ipmmu_device_reset(struct ip
>  
>  static const struct ipmmu_features ipmmu_features_default = {
>       .use_ns_alias_offset = true,
> +     .has_cache_leaf_nodes = false,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id ipmmu_of_ids[] = {
> @@ -965,19 +1014,31 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_d
>               mmu->base += IM_NS_ALIAS_OFFSET;
>  
>       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -     if (irq < 0) {
> -             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ found\n");
> -             return irq;
> -     }
>  
> -     ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ipmmu_irq, 0,
> -                            dev_name(&pdev->dev), mmu);
> -     if (ret < 0) {
> -             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ %d\n", irq);
> -             return ret;
> -     }
> +     /*
> +      * Determine if this IPMMU instance is a leaf device by checking
> +      * if the renesas,ipmmu-main property exists or not.
> +      */
> +     if (mmu->features->has_cache_leaf_nodes &&
> +         of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "renesas,ipmmu-main", NULL))
> +             mmu->is_leaf = true;

Given my previous comments:

        if (mmu->features->has_cache_leaf_nodes) {
                root_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
                                        "renesas,ipmmu-main", 0)
                if (root_np) {
                        root_pdev = of_find_device_by_phandle(root_np);
                        mmu->root = platform_get_drvdata(root_pdev);
                } else {
                        mmu->root = mmu;
                }
        }

or something along those lines?

Robin.

> +
> +     /* Root devices have mandatory IRQs */
> +     if (ipmmu_is_root(mmu)) {
> +             if (irq < 0) {
> +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no IRQ found\n");
> +                     return irq;
> +             }
>  
> -     ipmmu_device_reset(mmu);
> +             ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ipmmu_irq, 0,
> +                                    dev_name(&pdev->dev), mmu);
> +             if (ret < 0) {
> +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ %d\n", irq);
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +
> +             ipmmu_device_reset(mmu);
> +     }
>  
>       ret = iommu_device_register(&mmu->iommu);
>       if (ret)
> 

Reply via email to