Hi Borislav,

Quoting Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>:

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:30:10PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Value assigned to variable _ret_ at line 176 is overwritten
a few lines below before it can be used. This makes such
variable assignment useless.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1403730

Get rid of this tag...

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c b/drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c
index c51ec73..d1de53e 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/pnd2_edac.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int apl_rd_reg(int port, int off, int op, void *data, size_t sz, char *na
        edac_dbg(2, "Read %s port=%x off=%x op=%x\n", name, port, off, op);
        switch (sz) {
        case 8:
-               ret = sbi_send(port, off + 4, op, (u32 *)(data + 4));
+               sbi_send(port, off + 4, op, (u32 *)(data + 4));

... keep ret but OR it in with its previous value:

        case 8:
                ret  = sbi_send(port, off + 4, op, (u32 *)(data + 4));
                /* fall through */
        case 4:
                ret |= sbi_send(port, off, op, (u32 *)data);

                /* fall through */
        case 4:
                ret = sbi_send(port, off, op, (u32 *)data);

... and merge both into a single patch.


I got it. I'll send a new patch shortly.

Thanks!
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva





Reply via email to