On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:54:02 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > * Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Morton > > <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:14:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include > > >> <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h>. This will allow > > >> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops. > > > > > > This gets a large number of (simple) rejects when applied to > > > linux-next. Can you please redo against -next? > > > > > > This is based on tip/locking tree. Ingo already took a part of these > > series. The plan is that he takes the rest, and this applies on > > tip/locking without conflicts. > > Yeah, so I've taken the rest as well, it all looks very clean now. Should > show up > in the next -next, if it passes my (arguably limited) testing. > > Andrew, is this workflow fine with you? You usually take KASAN patches, but I > was > unhappy with the atomics instrumention of the earlier patches, and ended up > reviewing the followup variants, and felt that if I hinder a patchset I might > as > well test and apply it once I'm happy with them! ;-) > Sure..
