On 27-06-17, 18:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:20 AM, Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Rafael: Will it be fine to lower down the value of LATENCY_MULTIPLIER? > > We can do that, but then I think we need to compensate for the change > in the old governors code or there may be surprises.
Why shouldn't we change the value of LATENCY_MULTIPLIER for old governors as well? They use the same calculations and the sampling rate there is also this bad (like rate_limit_us). If we aren't going to change that for old governors, then we can create a local version of LATENCY_MULTIPLIER for schedutil I believe. -- viresh
