On 06/28/2017 08:02 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 14:28:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvms390 tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 2387149eade2 ("KVM: improve arch vcpu request defining")
>>
>> from the kvm-arm tree and commit:
>>
>> 8611a6a64661 ("KVM: s390: CMMA tracking, ESSA emulation, migration mode")
>>
>> from the kvms390 tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 9c3bd94204ac,a8cafed79eb4..000000000000
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@@ -42,9 -42,11 +42,11 @@@
>> #define KVM_HALT_POLL_NS_DEFAULT 80000
>>
>> /* s390-specific vcpu->requests bit members */
>> -#define KVM_REQ_ENABLE_IBS 8
>> -#define KVM_REQ_DISABLE_IBS 9
>> -#define KVM_REQ_ICPT_OPEREXC 10
>> -#define KVM_REQ_START_MIGRATION 11
>> -#define KVM_REQ_STOP_MIGRATION 12
>> +#define KVM_REQ_ENABLE_IBS KVM_ARCH_REQ(0)
>> +#define KVM_REQ_DISABLE_IBS KVM_ARCH_REQ(1)
>> +#define KVM_REQ_ICPT_OPEREXC KVM_ARCH_REQ(2)
>> ++#define KVM_REQ_START_MIGRATION KVM_ARCH_REQ(3)
>> ++#define KVM_REQ_STOP_MIGRATION KVM_ARCH_REQ(4)
>>
>> #define SIGP_CTRL_C 0x80
>> #define SIGP_CTRL_SCN_MASK 0x3f
>
> With the merge window appraoching, I assume that these 2 trees will
> merge in the kvm tree soon. This is just a reminder that this conflict
> still exists (I think).
Yes, these 2 trees will be merged in the kvm tree and Paolo/Radim will resolve
the conflict.
