Hi, Rafael > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: EC: Change EC noirq tuning to be an optional > behavior > > On Wednesday, June 14, 2017 01:59:24 PM Lv Zheng wrote: > > According to the bug report, though the busy polling mode can make noirq > > stages executed faster, it causes abnormal fan blowing in noirq stages. > > > > This patch prepares an option so that the automatic busy polling mode > > switching for noirq stages can be enabled by who wants to tune it, not all > > users. > > Noticed that the new global option cannot be changed during noirq stages. > > There is no need to lock its value changes to sync with polling mode > > settings switches. > > > > For reporters and testers in the thread, as there are too many reporters > > on the bug link, this patch only picks names from most active commenters. > > Sorry for the neglet. > > > > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=191181 > > Reported-by: Tatsuyuki Ishi <ishitatsuy...@gmail.com> > > Reported-by: Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <claudio.sacerdotic...@unibo.it> > > Tested-by: Nicolo' <nicolopiazzalu...@gmail.com> > > Reported-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> > > Tested-by: Gjorgji Jankovski <j.gjor...@gmail.com> > > Tested-by: Damjan Georgievski <gdam...@gmail.com> > > Tested-by: Fernando Chaves <nanocha...@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com> > > First of all, this seems to be a fix for commit c3a696b6e8f8 (ACPI / EC: Use > busy polling > mode when GPE is not enabled), so there should be a Fixes: tag pointing to > that > one. > > Moreover, if that is just a performance optimization and not a matter of > correctness, > why don't we simply drop acpi_ec_enter/leave_noirq() entirely? > > What is going to break if we do that?
Let me Cc Yu for justification. I just added busy poll support for suspend/boot according to the root cause reported by him. He should know the end user requirements better than me. Thanks and best regards Lv
