On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 06:10:35AM -0700, tip-bot for Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Commit-ID:  72298e5c92c50edd8cb7cfda4519483ce65fa166
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/72298e5c92c50edd8cb7cfda4519483ce65fa166
> Author:     Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:41:28 -0500
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> CommitDate: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:37:59 +0200
> 
> sched/cputime: Refactor the cputime_adjust() code
> 
> Address a Coverity false positive, which is caused by overly
> convoluted code:
> 
> Value assigned to variable 'utime' at line 619:utime = rtime;
> is overwritten at line 642:utime = rtime - stime; before it
> can be used. This makes such variable assignment useless.
> 
> Remove this variable assignment and refactor the code related.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1371643
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
> Cc: Frans Klaver <franskla...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgrus...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629184128.GA5271@embeddedgus
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cputime.c | 16 +++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index aea3135..67c70e2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -615,19 +615,13 @@ static void cputime_adjust(struct task_cputime *curr,
>        * userspace. Once a task gets some ticks, the monotonicy code at
>        * 'update' will ensure things converge to the observed ratio.
>        */
> -     if (stime == 0) {
> -             utime = rtime;
> -             goto update;
> +     if (stime != 0) {
> +             if (utime == 0)
> +                     stime = rtime;
> +             else
> +                     stime = scale_stime(stime, rtime, stime + utime);
>       }
>  
> -     if (utime == 0) {
> -             stime = rtime;
> -             goto update;
> -     }
> -
> -     stime = scale_stime(stime, rtime, stime + utime);
> -
> -update:
>       /*
>        * Make sure stime doesn't go backwards; this preserves monotonicity
>        * for utime because rtime is monotonic.


Argh, no... That code was perfectly fine. The new code otoh is
convoluted crap.

It had the form:

        if (exception1)
          deal with exception1

        if (execption2)
          deal with exception2

        do normal stuff

Which is as simple and straight forward as it gets.

The new code otoh reads like:

        if (!exception1) {
                if (exception2)
                  deal with exception 2
                else
                  do normal stuff
        }

which is absolute shit.

So NAK on this.


Reply via email to